RedCore coordinates planning, tools, memory, recovery, evidence, and reporting as one traceable engagement.
REDCORE
Autonomous Security Validation.
Built to adapt.
RedCore turns an authorized objective into a governed security engagement: planning the route, operating trusted tools, preserving evidence, adapting to failure, and preparing findings for human release.
Coverage is only useful when the boundary, decision, and evidence remain visible.
From authorized intent
to defensible evidence.
A complete operating layer for security teams that need more coverage without surrendering scope, control, or accountability.
Security leaders, internal red teams, AppSec programs, consultancies, and managed security operators.
Use a RedCore-managed engagement or an outbound-only runner near private assets.
Frozen scope, tenant isolation, signed assignments, audit events, emergency stop, and human release gates.
Define one outcome, one approved surface, acceptance criteria, and the evidence required to decide what comes next.
From intent to evidence.
Without handoffs.
RedCore is not a chatbot with a tool belt. It is a stateful agentic system that treats security as a continuous loop of reasoning, action, evidence, and adaptation.
Every action is tied to approved assets, methods, and execution windows.
Findings, failures, and discoveries persist as the engagement evolves.
Reports are generated from linked artifacts, not invented confidence.
One engagement.
Every decision visible.
Follow a sanitized engagement from authorization to report. The product frame updates as each stage enters view.
Scope is frozen before execution.
Approved assets, methods, windows, and exclusions become the policy boundary for every assignment.
Freeze the boundary
Written authorization, targets, windows, exclusions, and success criteria become machine-enforced policy.
Build the attack path
The planner reasons over objective, known state, available capabilities, and evidence still required.
Route to trusted tools
The runner receives a tenant-bound assignment and invokes only capabilities advertised by that environment.
Preserve the evidence chain
Outputs, timestamps, hashes, target relationships, and parser results stay attached to the finding.
Recover without losing state
Failures become signals for a bounded replanning decision instead of a blind repeat.
Move from evidence to action
Technical and executive views are generated from linked artifacts, then reviewed before release.
Manual Pentesting Alone
Doesn't Scale.
The attack surface moves faster than a checklist. RedCore turns fragmented security operations into a living, adaptive system.
Traditional Testing
- Linear methodology
- Tool-by-tool handoffs
- Context lost between runs
- Manual evidence stitching
- Expensive retesting cycles
RedCore
- Adaptive attack planning
- One stateful orchestrator
- Persistent engagement memory
- Evidence graph by default
- Continuous recovery loops
Built for the messy reality
of security.
A system that can reason over ambiguity, use the right tool at the right moment, and remain accountable to evidence.
Adaptive Planning
The plan changes when the target changes. No brittle playbooks.
Stateful Memory
Every discovery, failure, and decision remains available to the next step.
Tool Intelligence
Capabilities are selected by context, constraints, and expected evidence.
Evidence Graph
Artifacts connect targets, actions, findings, and remediation paths.
Failure Recovery
When a route fails, the agent diagnoses the failure and adapts.
Human-Ready Reports
Technical evidence becomes clear risk, impact, and remediation context.
See the attack surface
as a living system.
RedCore maps relationships between assets, services, credentials, vulnerabilities, and actions as the engagement unfolds.
242 tools.
One intelligence layer.
RedCore does not replace the tools security teams trust. It gives them context, sequencing, and memory.
All registered capabilities are available for inspection.
A closed loop.
Every time.
Intake
Define targets, rules, credentials, and success criteria.
Discover
Map the surface with the right reconnaissance capabilities.
Validate
Test hypotheses and preserve reproducible evidence.
Adapt
Recover from failures and re-plan from new state.
Report
Deliver findings, remediation, and retest status.
Watch the system think.
A simulated engagement view showing the relationship between reasoning, execution, and findings.
One evidence base.
Every audience covered.
A sanitized preview connects executive risk, technical reproduction, and attack-path context to the same finding record.
Trained for the
security loop.
Reasoning is grounded in tools, artifacts, policies, and prior engagement state. The model is an operator inside the system, not the system itself.
Context persists across the engagement loop.
Release gates keep human judgment in the loop.
Failure is not a dead end.
It is a signal.
RedCore classifies failures, updates state, and chooses the next bounded route instead of repeating the same action.
Exit codes, output, timing, and environment are retained.
Separate bad assumptions from unavailable capabilities.
Choose an approved alternative or refine the hypothesis.
Resume from the new state with a traceable decision.
A security system,
not a single prompt.
Policy, planning, routing, execution, memory, and reporting remain separate so every action can be inspected.
Execution stays close.
Control stays explicit.
The customer runner operates near private assets and initiates authenticated outbound communication. No inbound management port is required.
The worker initiates the control channel from inside the approved environment.
Wrong-tenant, expired, malformed, and out-of-scope assignments are rejected.
Choose findings-only, bounded evidence, or an explicitly approved full mode.
Cancellation, lease release, and audit confirmation are part of the lifecycle.
Registry counts describe definitions. Runner availability and engagement outcomes must be verified in the target environment.
Autonomy with
accountability.
RedCore is designed to move fast without making authorization invisible.
Customer-facing findings require evidence and human review. The model cannot authorize a target or release a report by itself.
Target boundaries and rules are explicit before a worker receives an assignment.
Claims are linked to output, timestamps, and artifact provenance.
Analysts validate impact, false positives, and remediation guidance before delivery.
Cancellation, lease expiry, and customer-controlled disablement are part of the operating model.
One operating system.
Six security missions.
Start with the surface that matters now. RedCore preserves a common governance and evidence model as coverage expands.
Coordinate discovery, API testing, source analysis, evidence, and retesting.
Explore use case EXTERNAL SURFACEContinuously map exposed riskDiscover assets, fingerprint services, validate findings, and track change.
Explore use case CLOUD SECURITYTest identity and configuration pathsConnect cloud posture, IAM relationships, exposure, and evidence.
Explore use case ACTIVE DIRECTORYReason across identity attack pathsMap directory state, credential exposure, privilege routes, and controls.
Explore use case KUBERNETESValidate cluster boundariesAssess posture, permissions, images, runtime exposure, and remediation.
Explore use case CONTINUOUS VALIDATIONRetest what changesPreserve engagement state, verify remediation, and surface drift.
Explore use caseThe same platform.
A different advantage.
Give security leadership a governed view of coverage, evidence, exposure, and retest state across authorized engagements.
Discuss a security programChoose your point of entry.
Every deployment begins with a scoped discovery conversation. Commercial terms are shaped by the approved surface, execution model, testing window, and evidence requirements.
A scoped, evidence-backed security assessment.
- Defined approved surface
- Application, source, cloud, and other profiles
- Technical and executive report
- Remediation review and retest option
- Managed RedCore execution
Recurring validation that shows what changed, what returned, and what was fixed.
- Recurring governed validation
- Baseline and delta findings
- New, regressed, and resolved tracking
- GitHub and/or runner integration
- Remediation, retest, and periodic summaries
Customer-controlled deployment and policy for larger or sensitive environments.
- Customer runner/private deployment planning
- Custom data modes and retention
- Dedicated operational controls
- Runner acceptance and capability review
- Procurement and security review support
Before you enter the loop.
No. It accelerates authorized security work and produces evidence for human review. Ownership, authorization, and release decisions remain with people.
Yes. The customer runner is designed for outbound-only operation close to private assets, subject to configuration and acceptance testing.
No. The registry count is not an installation claim. Each runner must advertise and certify its actual available capabilities.
A signed agreement, Statement of Work, Authorization to Test, and Rules of Engagement. A contact form never authorizes testing.
Ready to enter the loop?
Tell us the business outcome. Scope comes next. Do not submit credentials, target details, or confidential vulnerability information.
BUILT FOR THE EDGE OF SECURITY